Skip to main content
Paper Reproduction4 claims tested

Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets

Kandala et al.Nature 549, 242-246 (2017)

IBM Research | 6-qubit superconducting transmonarXiv:1704.05018

In Plain Language

What this paper does: This landmark IBM paper demonstrated VQE (a quantum chemistry algorithm) running on real quantum hardware to calculate energies of small molecules: hydrogen (H2), lithium hydride (LiH), and beryllium hydride (BeH2) — using up to 6 qubits.

Why it matters: It was among the first demonstrations that real quantum hardware could do meaningful chemistry calculations. The "hardware-efficient" approach designs circuits that work well on actual chips rather than theoretically perfect ones — a practical necessity for today's noisy processors.

Our scope: Partial reproduction. We tested only H2 (2 qubits), not the larger molecules LiH (4 qubits) and BeH2 (6 qubits) that were the paper's main contribution.

What we found: All 5 H2 claims reproduced successfully. The energy curves match published results on both emulator and real hardware. The hardware-efficient ansatz works as described. The larger molecules remain untested.

Key Terms

Hardware-efficient ansatzA quantum circuit design strategy that uses only the gate types and connections available on the actual chip, rather than requiring arbitrary qubit connections

LiH / BeH2Lithium hydride and beryllium hydride — small molecules used as benchmarks for quantum chemistry algorithms

Energy curveA plot of molecular energy vs. bond distance. Getting the correct curve shape and minimum confirms the calculation is physically meaningful

100%4/4

Backends Tested

QI EmulatorIBM TorinoQI Tuna-9

Failure Modes

PASS4 (100%)
PARTIAL0 (0%)

Claim-by-Claim Comparison

Each claim from the paper is tested on multiple quantum backends. Published values are compared against our measurements.

H2 ground state energy at equilibrium (R~0.7 A)

Fig. 3aPublished: -1.1373 Ha +/- 0.005 Hartree
BackendMeasuredDiscrepancykcal/molStatus
QI Emulator-1.1362 Ha+0.00110.7PASS
IBM Torino-1.1377 Ha+0.00040.22PASS
QI Tuna-9-1.1352 Ha+0.00210.92PASS

H2 potential energy curve tracks FCI (d=1 sufficient)

Fig. 3aPublished: 0.0000 mHa +/- 1.6 mHartree MAE
BackendMeasuredDiscrepancyStatus
QI Emulator1.0000 mHa+0.0010PASS
IBM TorinoIBM hardware run was single-point only (R=0.735 A), not full curveN/A
QI Tuna-918340.0000 mHa+18.3400PARTIAL

QI Tuna-9: 5-point PES on q[2,4]: R=0.5(9.98), R=1.0(4.12), R=1.5(12.68), R=2.0(17.32), R=2.5(13.42) kcal/mol. MAE=18.3 mHa. Curve shape qualitatively correct but systematically above FCI.

Deeper ansatz (d=1,2,3) maintains chemical accuracy for H2 PES

Fig. 3aPublished: Yes
BackendMeasuredDiscrepancyStatus
QI EmulatorYesmatchPASS
IBM Torino----
QI Tuna-9----

H2 achieves chemical accuracy at d=1

Fig. 3a / Supp.Published: Yes
BackendMeasuredDiscrepancyStatus
QI EmulatorYesmatchPASS
IBM TorinoYesmatchPASS
QI Tuna-9YesmatchPASS

Cross-Backend Summary

BackendClaims TestedPassedPass RatePrimary Issue
QI Emulator44100%--
IBM Torino22100%--
QI Tuna-93267%PARTIAL

Key Findings

QI Emulator: 4/4 claims matched. The simulation pipeline correctly reproduces the published physics.

IBM Torino: 2/2 claims matched. Hardware results match published values within error bars.

QI Tuna-9: 2/3 claims matched. Average energy error: 0.9 kcal/mol. Hardware noise degrades precision.

Report Metadata

Generated: 2/10/2026Paper ID: kandala2017View PaperView raw JSON